Date: 2014-09-26 09:12 am (UTC)
The point system seems to be more transparent and certain, at least in theory. When I was applying for Canadian residence 16 years ago, I knew I collect enough points to be admitted, so I could make plans. The drawback of the system is a possibility of a huge application backlog, which happened in Canada in the 2000s. They had means to reduce the intake of new applications, but they did not use them, perhaps for political reasons. Now they are switching to the pool system, when your application stays in the pool for a year; I am not sure the process of selecting applicants from the pool will be in any way transparent.

In theory, the point system allows a country to select "the best and the brightest". In real life, not everyone succeeds even with a "good" profession, and formal rules bar access to many prospective immigrants. I have known some people who forged their papers to get enough points for professional occupation they never had; now they all are well-established taxpayers. There was a research in Canada about 12 years ago, and it showed that the chances of establishing in the country mostly depend on language skills, level of education and work experience, but not that much on profession. So the "common folk" may benefit more from the lottery system.

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

peacetraveler22: (Default)
peacetraveler22

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 26th, 2025 03:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios