Private Gun Ownership - Good or Bad?

[peacetraveler22]

Last week, we had another mass shooting in America. A young college student deeply rooted in misogynist mentality, and frustrated by female rejection, decided to take a drive through a California college town and open fire, killing six people and wounding numerous others. As you know, guns are deeply rooted in American culture, and always have been. So why the recent proliferation of school and mass shootings over the last few years? I think in large part these tragedies are not a result of guns, but the sickness of society in general. After all, Americans have always been armed but the proliferation of mass shootings has been rather recent. Twenty years ago, or even ten, we didn't hear about such tragedies on a consistent basis.

People sometimes forget that the right to bear arms is expressly enumerated in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Private gun ownership is a principle upon which my country was founded. We are the most heavily armed civilian population in the world, with close to 300 million firearms in the hands of civilians, including my family members. I am completely pro gun, and have always been surrounded by firearms. I shoot Rifles, a 9mm glock and .357 Magnum Revolver at the range under the supervision of my father. So, where is the delicate balance between respecting the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens and preventing mass shootings?

I can't say there are any easy answers, nor do I know the best solution. For instance, in the most recent shooting, the culprit had a long history of mental illness. Police officers had even visited his house after worried calls from State mental health officials. Yet when they arrived, the shooter was completely calm and convincing. Thus, they had no legal grounds upon which to enter the home and search. If they had entered his room, they would have found his guns, his detailed plans for the massacre which he had been cooking for over a year, and other clear signs that something sinister was brewing.

People all over the globe are suffering from depression and other forms of mental illness, and they should not be under constant suspicion for seeking treatment. One simple way to mitigate widespread gun violence is to have tighter and consistent controls. Currently, gun laws drastically vary from State to State, and I don't claim to be an expert in nationwide legislation. Such knowledge is almost impossible. California is known as the strictest State, and Texas and my home State of Virginia are considered two of the most pro-gun locations in the nation. This is not surprising given that the National Rifle Association is headquartered only a 1/2 hour from my apartment. In Virginia, private citizens can openly carry firearms and I've seen it in restaurants, particularly in rural areas. Is it necessary? I don't think so. Only Washington, DC and Hawaii require all firearms to be registered.

Our founding Fathers made certain that private gun ownership will never completely become extinct in America, but this doesn't mean that laws shouldn't be changed. Some of the most strongly advocated solutions include:

(1) Background checks for all firearm owners
(2) Waiting period
(3) Registration of ALL firearms in every State
(4) For schools - allow teachers to carry firearms into the classroom and train them on use

What do you think? Do you wish Russia had more lenient laws for private gun ownership? What should America do to prevent these tragedies? I sometimes wonder if it's really possible to truly prevent a deranged person from committing these acts of violence. Even if tighter gun controls exist, they would likely still be able to obtain firearms on the black market. In the end, we cannot mandate good and evil, though an attempt should at least be made to control evil to the greatest extent possible.

Comments

[peacetraveler22.livejournal.com]

I also support the death penalty, but only in cases where there is conclusive video or forensic evidence linking the defendant to the crime. Otherwise, it's too risky because criminal juries unfortunately make mistakes sometimes and convict the innocent. And an innocent person should never die for a crime he or she didn't commit. It has happened in the past.

[skvorets1989.livejournal.com]

Finaly we can agree not only to disagree.

Talking about main topic I want to buy a gun but I don't really know what I want and what I can buy and where I can shoot it. And as they are quite expensive, I don't wan't make a mistake. And shooting ranges are also expensive. For instance here (http://www.tirspb.ru/s/24/prays-list.html) one shot from Kalashnikov costs 40 rubles. More than a dollar. And how many of them should I take to learn something? I guess many.

[peacetraveler22.livejournal.com]

In America, there is no cost to shoot at most ranges. You simply must buy ammunition there or targets; however, they don't closely monitor to see if you buy them there. Many people carry in their own bullets. The gun ranges always have shops where they sell new and used weapons, and this is how the businesses make money.

[skvorets1989.livejournal.com]

You simply must buy ammunition there or targets

And if you don't have your own gun then what do you do with it?

What are the lowest and average prices for firearms and ammunition in United States?

[peacetraveler22.livejournal.com]

Some are very, very cheap. For instance, look here http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?ic=16_0&Find=Find&search_query=pistols&Find=Find&search_constraint=0. Walmart is the American version of Auchan, selling groceries and all other kinds of merchandise. I don't know that much about prices because I always shoot my dad's guns and he always brings the ammo. :)

[skvorets1989.livejournal.com]

It is difficult to compare because there no information about rifles and in Russia pistols are forbiden for civilians. But prices for pistols are quite impressive I have to admit.