peacetraveler22: (Default)
[personal profile] peacetraveler22
photo (2)

Last week, we had another mass shooting in America. A young college student deeply rooted in misogynist mentality, and frustrated by female rejection, decided to take a drive through a California college town and open fire, killing six people and wounding numerous others. As you know, guns are deeply rooted in American culture, and always have been. So why the recent proliferation of school and mass shootings over the last few years? I think in large part these tragedies are not a result of guns, but the sickness of society in general. After all, Americans have always been armed but the proliferation of mass shootings has been rather recent. Twenty years ago, or even ten, we didn't hear about such tragedies on a consistent basis.

People sometimes forget that the right to bear arms is expressly enumerated in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Private gun ownership is a principle upon which my country was founded. We are the most heavily armed civilian population in the world, with close to 300 million firearms in the hands of civilians, including my family members. I am completely pro gun, and have always been surrounded by firearms. I shoot Rifles, a 9mm glock and .357 Magnum Revolver at the range under the supervision of my father. So, where is the delicate balance between respecting the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens and preventing mass shootings?

I can't say there are any easy answers, nor do I know the best solution. For instance, in the most recent shooting, the culprit had a long history of mental illness. Police officers had even visited his house after worried calls from State mental health officials. Yet when they arrived, the shooter was completely calm and convincing. Thus, they had no legal grounds upon which to enter the home and search. If they had entered his room, they would have found his guns, his detailed plans for the massacre which he had been cooking for over a year, and other clear signs that something sinister was brewing.

People all over the globe are suffering from depression and other forms of mental illness, and they should not be under constant suspicion for seeking treatment. One simple way to mitigate widespread gun violence is to have tighter and consistent controls. Currently, gun laws drastically vary from State to State, and I don't claim to be an expert in nationwide legislation. Such knowledge is almost impossible. California is known as the strictest State, and Texas and my home State of Virginia are considered two of the most pro-gun locations in the nation. This is not surprising given that the National Rifle Association is headquartered only a 1/2 hour from my apartment. In Virginia, private citizens can openly carry firearms and I've seen it in restaurants, particularly in rural areas. Is it necessary? I don't think so. Only Washington, DC and Hawaii require all firearms to be registered.

Our founding Fathers made certain that private gun ownership will never completely become extinct in America, but this doesn't mean that laws shouldn't be changed. Some of the most strongly advocated solutions include:

(1) Background checks for all firearm owners
(2) Waiting period
(3) Registration of ALL firearms in every State
(4) For schools - allow teachers to carry firearms into the classroom and train them on use

What do you think? Do you wish Russia had more lenient laws for private gun ownership? What should America do to prevent these tragedies? I sometimes wonder if it's really possible to truly prevent a deranged person from committing these acts of violence. Even if tighter gun controls exist, they would likely still be able to obtain firearms on the black market. In the end, we cannot mandate good and evil, though an attempt should at least be made to control evil to the greatest extent possible.

Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>
(deleted comment)

Date: 2014-05-30 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
You are not scared of a woman with a gun? :))
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 03:25 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 03:42 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 03:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 06:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] real-marsel.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:28 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] girlspell.livejournal.com
There really isn't anything you can do. Guns are allowed and I'm glad. We are protected in the constitution. Most shooting happen by people that are mentally ill. There are safe guards. This latest shooter was examined before by mental health experts. But mental illness is not understood very well. They slip through. He was able to purchase a gun legally. I'm not that much of a fan by the NRA. They are more for gun manufacturers then actual gun owners. But they are typical of all lobbying groups. They are there and it's legal. Crime wise, most guns are stolen. Still the track listing of how guns change ownership is a good crime tool. I'm not sure how it is for gun ownerships outside the U.S. I have no idea what countries they are allowed or not allowed to have a weapon.

Date: 2014-05-30 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
I agree, the real problem is the person, not the gun. The NRA is the most powerful lobby group in America, that's why laws are so slow to change. All politicians, even Democrats who usually favor tighter gun restrictions, are scared of them. I don't know international gun laws either, it varies so much across the globe. But I remember reading Yemen is second to U.S. in civilian gun ownership.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] girlspell.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 05:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seadevil001.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-10 01:27 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-10 02:23 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seadevil001.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-10 02:40 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 03:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anonymus.livejournal.com
Great Russian sings said: "Rifle is a celebration!" :)
It`s true.

Date: 2014-05-30 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
What about laws in Russia? A private citizen can own a rifle for non-hunting purposes?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anonymus.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 06:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iravra.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 09:02 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 03:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iravra.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 07:04 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] iravra.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 09:06 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fesma94.livejournal.com
Definitely good to own gun! But more important to have proper laws,to protect gunner who protect own property and life.
Edited Date: 2014-05-30 03:48 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-05-30 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Are there strict gun laws in Israel, I have no idea? Private citizens can own any type of weapon, or no? I certainly know all soldiers have them because I encountered so many during my trip at all of the checkpoints. :) And they all look like little kids carrying these huge weapons as a means of intimidation.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fesma94.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 07:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seadevil001.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-10 01:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-10 02:24 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seadevil001.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-10 02:42 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 03:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] petro-witch.livejournal.com
Actually 3 of 6 were killed by a knife and 2 of 6 were killed by his car. So, 7 people were injured by the shooting and 1 of these 7 is died. I'm wondering why all mass media are talking about guns? Why not about knives or cars?

Date: 2014-05-30 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] south-of-broad.livejournal.com
Simple! They would have to admit " guns don't kill, people do ."

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 04:57 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 07:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 07:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 07:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 07:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] south-of-broad.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] south-of-broad.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:57 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 10:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-02 11:31 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] south-of-broad.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-02 03:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] qi-tronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-02 03:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moonrainbow.livejournal.com
Oh, that IS a holywar topic!

I tend to be against private gun ownership. I believe that if you can own a gun, a criminal can, too, and your gun doesn't help you against the criminal if you are not ready to shoot at people (and criminals are easy with shooting).

But then I listen to my wife and she's a supporter! She says that a girl can't stand against man's brute force, but a gun in a girl's hand changes the game!

So even a family can't agree on this simple topic, do you really expect finding solution in a big society?

Date: 2014-05-30 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
In Texas, you can shoot almost anyone, even if they trespass on your neighbor's lawn. Not your OWN lawn, but someone else's. But it's surprising to me that you're against all private gun ownership. What about for hunting, is it okay? I always knew Maria is a wise woman. :))

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moonrainbow.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 05:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

Texas is the greatest state!

From: [identity profile] zyrianov.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 06:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fesma94.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 07:48 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 04:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] south-of-broad.livejournal.com
1 and 2 is already in place in some states. At least In SC , I also had to go to school in order to get concealed weapon permit. 3 is unconstitutional . Law abiding citizens will register their guns, criminals won't . So what's the point? 4- I am all for it! The sign on the door won't prevent evil from entering , the teacher with the gun will.

Date: 2014-05-30 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
There is no schooling or wait period in VA, unless the laws have recently changed. Anyone off the street can go to a gun show (and there are a lot of them here!!) and buy a firearm on the spot. I don't think 3 is unconstitutional. We are required to register our automobiles and pay taxes, inspection fees, etc. on them. Imagine the uproar if we began to tax private gun ownership!!! :)) I'm an advocate for training, esp. in those States where you can openly carry a weapon.

Date: 2014-05-30 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leo-sosnine.livejournal.com
America should do nothing about that. The problem about this guy and similar cases is just growing population. If people own guns sometimes they will kill each other with guns and that's inevitable. More population in size -- more cases like that. Of course guns make it easier for people to kill each other and banning guns completely will eventually lessen numbers of people injured in killing sprees, but won't stop killing sprees themselves, remember a recent knife killing spree in on american school?. People always tend to kill each other and it's not necessarily bad. This case was bad, however.

On the other hand, killing sprees can be stopped effectively by other people who carry their guns with them, so I support your suggestion on school teachers carrying guns.

Nice pic!

Date: 2014-05-30 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
"People always tend to kill each other and it's not necessarily bad." :)) When is it not bad to kill others? The only exception is warfare or self-defense. I also like this photo. It was taken in the back of my dad's pick-up truck at Christmas time.

Date: 2014-05-30 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] new-forester.livejournal.com
I love it when the pro-gun people bring up the 2nd amendment. You forget that the Constitution is but a document. It was written by people and people can change it. It has been changed (amended) many times before and what makes you think it can't be amended again to repeal the 2nd amendment? There was a time when the 2nd amendment made a lot of sense. It doesn't any more. Self-defense is a myth. Does that person trespassing on your lawn really deserve a death penalty for his crime? Gun ownership takes justice from the courts and the legal system and puts it into citizens' hands, Wild West style. I am uncomfortable with that.

Date: 2014-05-30 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
I agree the Constitution is a "living document" that should adjust with societal changes, but you can't underestimate its importance, particularly with respect to civil liberties. In fact, it has been amended less than 20 times in over 200 years despite over 10,000 attempts by legislators. The main exception was the Bill of Rights, of which the Second Amendment is a part. It will never be repealed. Impossible.

I agree a person trespassing on your lawn doesn't deserve to be shot, but once they enter your private home you should have a right to self-defense. I'm not sure why you think self-defense is a myth? What about alcohol? It also is a deadly weapon when people consume massive amounts and get behind the wheel and kill people in accidents. Should it also be banned? The number of very responsible gun owners FAR outweighs those who do harm, so things must be kept in perspective.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] new-forester.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] new-forester.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 08:54 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко - Date: 2014-05-30 10:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skribacov.livejournal.com
Право на оружие священная корова свободного общества

Date: 2014-05-30 07:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Да, я соглашаюсь.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ypolozov.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 07:09 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 12:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 07:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tombormor.livejournal.com
In Russia private guns are strictly prohibited except for the hunting purposes. And even for hunting you have to get a license first, that is not so easy.

I'm totally agree with you that the problem is the person who shoots, not a gun. So I suppose there should be restrictions for gun owners and compulsive background check.

But also I think that it's a little strange that in the U.S. (as far as I know) there are no special clinics for people with mental diseases. But often these people are dangerous both for themselves and for other people. They are not criminals to be imprisoned, but they should be monitored and controlled by doctors, and some cases demand isolation of the patient for safety reasons.

Date: 2014-05-30 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
There are such facilities in America, but I think there is still great stigma and shame associated with mental illness so many people do not seek help. I agree there should be compulsive background checks for all owners.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко - Date: 2014-05-30 10:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pin-gwin.livejournal.com
My problems with guns are--
-By my life experience, it is hard to convince me that if I were having a gun ( any kind of) I would have it handy in right time for personal protection. Trying to keep it around all the time feels a big hassle.

-Another point - I have to be ready to use it against another human being. In theory, I understand that it may be the only right thing to do, however I do not feel right to do it cold blooded. At much younger age I was hunting with my friends and holding warm beautiful birds I just killed does not make me feel right even they were very tasty after all.

I leave now in a very safe suburban area and simply do not see a reason why should I carry a gun with me... it would be just another complication. At the same time, if I would smell any kind of public revolt, I would immediately get Kalashnikov from local Fleet Farm. But not before that.

Date: 2014-05-30 08:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
I could never hunt or shoot an animal either, although I eat them. I don't even like going to a butcher shop and seeing them hanging and gutted. :( I'm not sure I could kill another person, even if my life depended on it. We can never know unless we're placed in the situation. "Any type of public revolt." You know when Obama was first elected there was a huge panic amongst gun owners. Ammunition and gun sales soared because people feared tighter controls would immediately be implemented. Yet little has changed with respect to guns during his administration.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pin-gwin.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко - Date: 2014-05-30 10:32 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pin-gwin.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 10:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко - Date: 2014-05-30 10:39 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 09:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moebiuscat.livejournal.com
Well, with rare exceptions gun-related crimes are overwhelmingly committed with illegal black-market weapons. It's easy for a criminal to buy a gun, why would he get a registered and traceable gun so he can be csught?

So most gun control laws are just making it tougher for honest people to buy guns, making criminal's lives easier.

Date: 2014-05-30 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
What about Canada? How strict are laws there?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moebiuscat.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:47 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко - Date: 2014-05-30 10:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moebiuscat.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 03:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 01:19 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moebiuscat.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 03:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moebiuscat.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 10:04 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 01:26 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] moebiuscat.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 02:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] south-of-broad.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-30 09:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-30 10:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко (from livejournal.com)
I'm new to the States and all these dances around gun control make me understand that there are idiots in US politics as well as in Russian. Ok, there is no politics in Russia but anyway :)

The stories when the bill introduced in NY to decrease the size of the magazines from 10 to 7 rounds and explanation is mass shootings in schools... WHAT?! 8-0
The real explanation is the same as I saw many times in Russia: We did something loud. It does not and even can not have any effect on the problem in question. But this is a simple thing to do and we will shout everywhere that it does help. And some people will believe.

One of the effects of Santa Barbara shooting is the new bill proposed in California (less then a week from shooting) proposing a right for courts and polices to search and confiscate your guns if someone will tell the police that you're thinking about something bad.
It's even better then Minority report! :)

One important thing to remember is that all the gun control laws are affecting only law-abiding people. They do not have any effect on criminals.

Date: 2014-05-31 12:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onkel-hans.livejournal.com
Guns for the people cannot may not ever be allowed in Russia.

Government is perceived in the U.S, as an unfriendly agency. The Constitution,by definition, is a tool to protect the people against government.
The guns are available to the citizens of America because of their right to protect themselves against the government, primarily.

Exactly for the same reason it is inconceivable that the government may allow guns in Russia. There is no reason even to talk about this in Russia. First - get rid of your terrorist government. But - just you try!
Edited Date: 2014-05-31 12:43 am (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 01:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Алексей Петренко - Date: 2014-05-31 03:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 03:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-05-31 12:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onkel-hans.livejournal.com
To possess guns is a great right. But apart from possess, people must know and practice how to use guns.
In Central Virginia there are no shooting galleries. I tried to learn why and the gun stores told me, it's simple - the liability kills the cat the shooting ranges.

In place of the NRA, I would widely promote the shooting ranges, having a gun and not knowing how to shoot the target is even worse than not having a gun.

Date: 2014-05-31 01:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Close to my house we have an outdoor shooting range. I remember the first time I went, I was a bit freaked out with people shooting in the open, standing right beside one another. Basically no barriers exist and any madman could open fire, yet this has never happened. Because as I've said numerous times in the comments, the majority of gun owners in America are responsible and take firearm safety seriously. Plus, a range is the worst possible place for a maniac to attempt a criminal shooting spree. Everyone around him or her is armed and it would be the equivalent of a suicide mission, as the culprit would be instantly shot. No doubt about it.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] onkel-hans.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 02:29 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-05-31 03:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

Our founding Fathers made... (с)

Date: 2014-05-31 02:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] andrey-kaminsky.livejournal.com
I have great respect for the Founding Fathers, but I doubt very much that they were so insightful that when they allowed citizens to own a gun, they mean automatic, semi-automatic as well as chemical and biological weapons.
Although, perhaps, among them a prophet was and he said to others: "Centuries later, the weapon will be so perfect that one person can kill a dozen of people for a minute". And others replied: "We do not care, let them shoot. People love to shoot. Medicine at that time will be better than now"
And yet, the weapon causes people to lie. People pronounce sublime arguments, talk about the constitution and the rights, but, in fact, we are talking about toys. People are willing to put up with the fact that murders occur in schools in order that they could shoot bottles and be photographed with their favorite toys. Own toys are more valuable than lives of others.

Re: Our founding Fathers made... (с)

Date: 2014-05-31 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] onkel-hans.livejournal.com
Sorry, I am afraid you are completely off the target.
The Founding Fathers were incredibly insightful.

The guns are not toys, they are the protection against a rogue government.
The value of a human life is very clear to every man who shares the Christian morality.

Date: 2014-05-31 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burfoerste.livejournal.com
Till recently I had absolutely negative position regarding bearing arms by civilians. But now after all terrible and vile events in Ukraine where national army shoots in peaceful unarmed citizens only because they have their own opinion and don't agree with goverment I changed my position and added one checkmark for pros column. Americans have choice to defend theirs homes, not only run from country or be shooted without resistance. I suddenly understanded why such organisation as the NRA exists in USA and what is privilege when not only goverment and army have guns but also civilians. At least I consider it more fair.
Edited Date: 2014-05-31 08:38 am (UTC)

Date: 2014-05-31 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Completely agree!

Date: 2014-05-31 09:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] general-denikin.livejournal.com
I' not sure about towns, suburbs and countryside, but I believe gun carrying must be forbidden in big cities as New York or Los Angeles. I'm strong supporter former mayor Mike Bloomberg who made a lot to bring about a restrictions for gun carrying. And now we can see result - much less murders in the City than before.

Date: 2014-05-31 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
I don't see the purpose of always carrying a weapon in public, regardless of whether it's a big city or farm town. New York also has very, very strict gun laws. Some of the toughest in the nation, particularly for licensing requirements. But I think this is good.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] general-denikin.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-01 10:08 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-01 10:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-06-01 12:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] olgor.livejournal.com

What the law says?
And why do you folks always try to reduce everything to the binary option?

Date: 2014-06-01 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
You live here, so you know what the law says. :) Not sure what you mean by "you folks," because Americans are very divided on the topic of guns. Many advocates, and many opponents on both sides of the argument.

Date: 2014-06-01 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skvorets1989.livejournal.com
I can't say there are any easy answers, nor do I know the best solution.

There are easy answers.

1. People who do it, they do it for their 15 minutes of fame. Media should not make celebrities out of criminals. I don't think there should be special law for this. But people working in the press and TV should understand the difference between movie stars, sport champions and mass murderers. Now it seems that they don't.

2. People who do it, should not live. It would be the best if they were killed the moment they start to try to shoot innocent people. But if the tragedy could not be prevented then the criminal must face the ultimate punishment. I see it as a greatest injustice that Breivik who murdered dozens and injured hundreds is in normal health, has a bed, food, shower and public attention to whatever he calls his ideology.

3. People who organize free gun zones or in any other way obstruct someone's ability to defend herself, in case of a tragedy should be considered as companion in crime in the court.

In Israel the entire young population boys and girls have guns and they go with them everywhere. Everywhere! And no mass shootings occur. Even terrorists use hidden explosives and not firearms. There was even case when taxi driver killed a terrorist with his own pistol. Which is another good reason to love this country.


Date: 2014-06-01 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
1. I agree! In fact, one major news channel, CNN, no longer mentions shooters' names in most live reports. They instead focus on the victims, in an effort to draw attention away from the criminal.

2. Well, Norway is known for its luxurious prisons so even scumbags like Anders Behring Breivik really aren't suffering for their atrocious acts. Btw, do you support the death penalty? In recent cases in America, the police don't play around and there's no hesitation to put a bullet in and kill the shooter. However, these people are usually the biggest cowards, and end up shooting themselves and committing suicide before this happens.

Not sure, I didn't really notice anyone carrying guns in Israel except the young soldiers standing at every checkpoint, trying to intimidate passer-bys with their big weapons.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skvorets1989.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-02 12:44 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-03 02:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skvorets1989.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-03 06:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-03 06:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skvorets1989.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-03 06:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-03 07:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skvorets1989.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-06-03 07:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

Why do you need a gun?

Date: 2014-06-05 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] xpo-xpo-xpo.livejournal.com
You like hunting? There is no problem with your gun provided you keep it safe from children and strangers. And in Russia there is no problem with hunting guns either. You like shooting targets? Why not to practice in some special places? In this case you can even store your weapon with the shooting facility (not to look for a safe big enough to hold your favorite 152 mm howitzer). In Russia you will have some problems with some of the weapons (like you cannot possess hand-guns). You want to feel safe in your house? OK, keep you weapon away from children, there will be no problems in Russia (if you want just a hunting rifle for self-defense). But if you want to protect yourself in the streets, your weapons will be useless. If a guy with a knife is a foot away from you (and you don't know he has a knife and is preparing to attack) - he will kill you sooner than you can even think about your pistol. If a guy with a baseball bat is around the corner - the best thing that can occur is someone calling the ambulance in time - no matter how many Colts you have. You want to be a part of militia? It's hard to imagine any real war with militias being of any importance, especially on the US land: who can attack US land? Mexico or Canada?

Russians have good funny story about weapons. One cowboy liked to ambush saloons shooting his revolvers and kicking some asses. Once he opened the door with his boot and found an old guy having his whiskey and being absolutely calm. They talked. Old guy advised him to file the front-sight down of his revolver.
- Why? - asked young cowboy.
- You know, - answered the old one, - long time ago I was so tough as you are. I liked to kick some asses, to fire my gun. But once I met seven tough guys. They took my Colt and put it into my ass. My advice to you, son: file the front-sight down.

Re: Why do you need a gun?

Date: 2014-06-05 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Responsible gun owners, like my family, do all of the things you mentioned. We properly store weapons, only shoot at ranges, etc. I don't think the majority should be punished for the irresponsible/criminal actions of the minority. Russians have stories and tales about everything. :))

Date: 2014-06-09 03:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vladkorzun.livejournal.com
"Private Gun Ownership" - that what we need in Ukraine right now. We cannot have even 9mm pistol with rubber bullets in private hands. You can buy hunting rifle to defend the house, but you can't use it for self defense on the streets. All criminals have illegal unregistered Makarov or TT pistols, but normal people cannot own any firearms that can be useful for self-defense.

Date: 2014-06-09 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Of course, the whole world has been watching events in Ukraine very closely this year. My best friend is from Ukraine, and I visited him a few years ago. I stayed mostly in Kyiv but also visit Uman. He now lives and works in Southern France, but I hope he returns some day because I'd like to explore other parts of the country with a local.

Date: 2014-06-16 08:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anna-sollanna.livejournal.com
Hi Shannon!
You know, my husband completely agrees with you about a private gun ownership. He adores a story about one Texas's citizen who killed a robber and when the police arrived the only thing he was told was "Thank you, sir!". As for shooting at schools - my husband thinks that the only way to prevent it or at least reduce the number of victims is to arm all teachers and staff with firearms and train them to use them.
As for me - I agree with you that the root of recent shootings is not in the private gun ownership, but in people's mental state. If a person is on a verge of a nervous breakdown and wants to kill or injure somebody just to feel better - he or she will do in spite of any laws prohibiting firearms or other weapons, with any accessible tools. So the root of the disease, but not the symptoms should be treated.
Btw what do you think about smoking prohibitions everywhere? I am not a smoker, and I think that non-smokers should be protected from smokers, but smokers do have their own right to smoke when and where they do not cause inconveniences of people around them, and I am afraid that nowadays this right is already violated...

Date: 2014-06-16 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Your husband has a very American view toward guns. :) Re smoking, I really hate it! I remember during my first journey in Russia going to a pub and being completely engulfed in smoke. It irritates my eyes, and leaves a horrible smell on clothes and hair. So, I support full smoking bans in restaurants, airports, stores, public transport, etc. As you probably know, in America we have had smoke-free environments in public places for a long time. However, I understand the prohibition is very recent in Russia. Do citizens actually obey the law, or do people still smoke in pubs? In many bars here, there will be an outside space dedicated to smokers, and almost all American airports have enclosed smoke rooms for travelers, so there are still options available to smokers, but they are limited. Smoking is much less popular in America than overseas.

Date: 2014-08-10 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] seadevil001.livejournal.com
I am in MA now. Guns are registered in this state. Does it helps? Not really, thugs in poor Boston hoods still shoots each other. I have LTC in MA and believe it is great for capitalist/individualist society. As to your other ideas:
1. Waiting period - guy in question prepared for one year. How long waiting period should be? Whole idea seems to be ridiculous to me. In family affairs somebody who is perfectly sane may just snap and run to store to buy pistol and shoot significant other. But psychopaths usually plan well in advance and does not leave anything to chance.
2. Background checks - idea is good. But checks will be as good as databases are. That guy in Virginia tech slipped through because your state played petty politics with data they were supposed to send to FBI. Then there are HIPAA. Differences must be reconciled and some good sense rules established for checks to work. It will be nice to have ways for private parties to get access to this database to check somebody willing to purchase firearm privately. MA has this option BTW, private citizens can sell/purchase registered firearm directly, registering transaction on state police web site.
3. Teachers should have option to arm themselves (in Israel it is common for teachers to be armed, since Maalot massacre http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma'alot_massacre). Parents may form voluntary guard as well.

But, as somebody pointed out firearms are not cause of problem. After all worst school massacre happen without single shot fired. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_School_disaster
What is the cause, I have trouble to say. But, I am not American by birth and upbringing, so there are something I miss.

As to gun rights in Russia, they do exist. It is fairly easy to get shotgun. In order to get a rifle you have to posses shotgun for five years, then you can get rifle permit (does not make sense, but there are some historical reasons for it). Pistols are out of question for majority of people, though you can get one for sport - but it must be stored at your club, not at your house. Machine guns are out of question as well. People can buy just about any rifle if it is semiauto, bolt or lever action. Moreover, semiauto versions of WW2 SMGs and machineguns (like Maxim machine gun) are widely available. Law limit overall length of rifle, not barrel length. So, PPSH-41 is legit in semiauto version. Also, there are limitations on mag capacity - 10 rounds. However, there are some legit way around it and most people I know have normal capacity mags. Silencers are not allowed and oddly enough reloading for rifles are in gray area. Ammo is very expensive by US standards. Another interesting feature - convicts can get license for firearms after certain period of time after conviction. No lifetime bans. Whatever region/city issued an license it is legal and entitled you to same rights though whole Russia. This I miss in US (having VA lifetime hunting license and forced to travel through NJ and NY!). You cannot carry loaded firearm on you (except while hunting) but you can transport it in case with loaded magazine in the same case. Case may be unlocked and in front seat of your car. Obviously it is fairly good for self defense scenario.

I got my first shotgun in Soviet times. It was fairly easy to get license, but to buy one... I looked around for almost a year. Rifles were really hard to get in last years of USSR. Around 1976 law was adopted which essentially outlawed rifle possession for citizens. Talk was that dear leaders does not want to give some russian "Oswald" chance. Most liberal times for firearms possession were in 1940-50. Yes, during Stalin times. Obviously he was not afraid of armed populace. Indeed pistols and machineguns would not be legal (though a lot of bureaucrats carried pistols then and a lot of people were awarded pistols for service in war and on home front) but police did not paid attention to shotguns and rifles were common.

Date: 2014-08-10 10:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com
Wow! Thanks for such an interesting and thoughtful response, esp. about gun rights in Russia. People have told me some of the rules/laws, but your insight is the most informational. Regarding restrictions or precautions, it's a very complicated issue. I agree those who pass background checks and purchase a gun after being pre-screened can still snap in a fit of rage at any moment. This covers all socio-economic classes. In this case, you correctly note the background checks do nothing to prevent the harm. Criminals and derelicts will always find a way to get arms and ammunition on the black market also. I don't have any answers for the problems, except to say that a gun alone can never kill anyone. It requires a human to pull the trigger, so people are the problem. Not the guns. I think society in general has become more crazed, scary and ill-tempered, and this contributes to the rise in killings in recent years.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] seadevil001.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-11 12:33 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-08-11 12:38 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] Юрий Безфамильный - Date: 2014-09-18 07:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] peacetraveler22.livejournal.com - Date: 2014-09-18 07:04 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2014-09-18 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] Юрий Безфамильный (from livejournal.com)
>>>Do you wish Russia had more lenient laws for private gun ownership?

Yes.

>>>(1) Background checks for all firearm owners
(4) For schools - allow teachers to carry firearms into the classroom and train them on use

Yes

>>>(2) Waiting period
(3) Registration of ALL firearms in every State

No.
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>

Profile

peacetraveler22: (Default)
peacetraveler22

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 03:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios